Posts Tagged ‘stop-loss’

Revealed: Stock market dirty tricks?manipulated sell

Tuesday, February 27th, 2007

The stock market is a wild place where fools are often parted from their money. It is also a place where fortunes are accumulated by the wise. Besides the fool and the wise, the stock market is also a place where gamblers, speculators and punters play with their luck. It is also an ideal place for the sly to practice their bag of dirty tricks. Today, we will look at one of their dirty tricks.

Back in Crowding at the exits, we mentioned that:

One popular idea among technical analysis is the concept of a ?support level,? whereby stock prices are expected to ?rest? on and rebound from. Traders often place their ?stop-losses? on the support level, which is the price level that they will sell their stocks in order to cut their losses. As the stock price rests on some traders? stop-loss levels, it triggered their stop-loss sales of their stocks. Such sales put downward pressure on the stock price, which may result in other stop-loss levels to be breached, which in turn triggered even more stop-loss sales. The outcome is a very steep and rapid fall in stocks prices.

Such widespread use of technical analysis can present an opportunity for the well-resourced foxes. Stock prices often fluctuate within a range. The lower bound of the range is called the ?support? level and the upper bound is called the ?resistance? level. Traders using technical analysis may see any breakthrough out of these two levels as significant because such an event signals a change from the status quo. Thus, they may place their stop-loss price (the predefined price in which existing holdings of the stock will be liquidated if the stock price fall to it) below the support level.

What would these foxes do when the stock price approach the support level? As you may have guessed by now, they would sell the stock (either from their existing holdings or borrowed) in order to push down its price to below the support level. This in turn will instigate a wave of selling. The outcome is a very rapid drop in stock price that the foxes can then exploit for their benefit.

Crowding at the exits

Sunday, January 7th, 2007

Recently, we had done anecdotal verbal surveys and observations among the people we know. We notice these curious trends:

  1. More and more people (i.e. retail private investors) are trading the stock markets on the side. Leveraged derivatives, like Contract-For-Difference (CFD) are increasingly being used.
  2. More and more people believe that a big crash will happen one day.

For the first trend, that may explain the increase in volatility among the stock market, which in our opinion often does not exhibit the most rational of all behaviour. We believe one of the reasons is because of the widespread use of technical analysis. One popular idea among technical analysis is the concept of a ?support level,? whereby stock prices are expected to ?rest? on and rebound from. Traders often place their ?stop-losses? on the support level, which is the price level that they will sell their stocks in order to cut their losses. As the stock price rests on some traders? stop-loss levels, it triggered their stop-loss sales of their stocks. Such sales put downward pressure on the stock price, which may result in other stop-loss levels to be breached, which in turn triggered even more stop-loss sales. The outcome is a very steep and rapid fall in stocks prices. This outcome is an example of irrational and volatile market behaviour that is increasing in frequency. With easy availability of (1) leveraged instruments like CFDs, (2) instantaneous communications via the Internet and (3) automation of trading via computers at the hands of the common people (who are not trained to think like true investors), this effect becomes magnified even more.

For the second trend, it may be the consequence of the fact that the common people are beginning to understand and see the absurdities, excesses and greed in the financial systems. Unfortunately, even among those who believe that a crash is inevitable, they still have a substantial portion of the wealth in the stock market, either voluntarily through their side trading, or involuntarily through their superannuation. For some of these side traders, they may believe that it is all right as long as you know ?when? to get out of the stock market.

This is the scary part.

If you sincerely believe that a crash is inevitable, you have to understand these facts:

  1. You cannot know ?when? to get out. Crashes always take the majority by surprise. Otherwise, the majority would have gotten out long ago, which means it cannot be called a crash in the first place.
  2. By the time you know it is time to get out, chances are, everyone else does too.

What is the implication? The first trend, along with these facts implies that when a crash happens, it will be so extremely rapid that vast amount of paper wealth will vanish in seconds as the gigantic herd heads for the crowded exits simultaneously. Your chances of surviving a crash with your wealth intact is pretty much zero. Even scarier, since the vast majority of people have much of their accumulated wealth in the stock market through their superannuation, a crash will affect this vast majority, which is an unprecedented scale in all of human history.

Please bear in mind that we are not predicting a massive crash in the days ahead. We are highlighting the important point that if you sincerely believe that a crash is inevitable, the time to get out is NOW, which is the most rational thing to do. The ideas of (1) an inevitable crash and (2) staying in the stock market while the party is still on, are mutually incompatible. On the other hand, if this is not your belief, then you can pretty much ignore everything this article has to say.


The ABCs of hedging

Wednesday, December 6th, 2006

One of the claptraps that we get to see nowadays is ?Hedge Funds.? According to the Encarta dictionary, the word ?hedge? is defined as: ?a means of protection against something, especially a means of guarding against financial loss.? A ?hedge fund? was originally meant for managed funds that employ hedging to protect against any market downturn and perhaps even profiting from it. Today, there are many funds that call themselves ?hedge funds? even though in reality, they do not hedge at all. Those fund managers are more akin to gamblers betting on anything that they can get their hands on, often using huge amount of borrowed money and derivatives to magnify their punts. In addition, unlike the conventional gamblers in the casino, those gamblers are usually absolved from personal losses if they lose their bets. Instead, it is often those poor investors who entrusted their money to those scoundrels who have to pay the price. Worse still, if those gamblers won their bet, they will often be the first to carve out a slice of their winnings. Thus, if you should decide to entrust your wealth to a hedge fund, please make sure the fund manager is not a gambler in disguise and that the fund does indeed hedge. There are too many quacks, swindlers and cheats in the financial industry waiting to devour your money.

Now, as a private investor, how do you hedge your portfolio? In other words, how do you reduce the risk of potentially significant losses in your portfolio?

The most well-known and basic technique is diversification, which is spreading out your investments across different stocks, industry, asset classes and so on. Unfortunately, this technique has major limitations. Firstly, though diversification reduces your risk, it also reduces your chances of making big gains. It is possible to over-diversify, which will result in mediocre returns over the long term. Secondly, diversification will not protect you against major economic catastrophe when deflationary forces wipe out the value of almost every class of investment. Thus, for investors after atypical excellence, diversification is not the most favoured method of hedging because they would rather reduce risks by increasing and improving their skills, knowledge and understanding then by scattering their eggs over many baskets. The best investors would rather concentrate their investments on the ones that they understand intimately than to spread out their investments to make up for lack of understanding. In other words, diversification is a very blunt tool for hedging.

What is the more precise strategy for hedging? For long-term value investors, there is this ?war-gaming? approach. Military planners often go through war games where they work out the outcome of all the possible scenarios and develop strategies to specifically counter each of the unfavourable outcomes. The same can be applied to investing. This risk management approach will determine how you structure your portfolio. Given each of the economic what-if scenarios, what are your plans to ensure that your portfolio will survive and perhaps even thrive? For example, what are your plans for your investments if oil prices sky rocket? What happens if the US dollar collapses? What if the global economic imbalances unwind disorderly? For you to be able to evaluate the ?war-gaming? scenarios, you would need to understand both global and local economic conditions. That is why in this publication, we often delve into economics, which some novice investors mistakenly believe is irrelevant and is the ?job? of the government.

Then there are the more tactical approaches for hedging, which is more relevant for short-term traders but nonetheless can be adapted for long-term investors as well. The most basic of these is the stop-loss. It is a tool mainly used by trader to pre-define the price which they will exit their position regardless of what their emotions tell them in the heat of the battle. Stop-loss does not prevent you from making a loss?they let you pre-define your potential loss before you enter the trade. For those more advanced traders, there are more powerful tools for hedging using derivatives. For example, delta-neutral option strategies allow you to potentially profit from all kinds of short-term market situations and limit your losses to pre-defined levels should you turn out to be wrong.

There are a lot more to hedging and risk management than we can say in this article. We hope this will be a good starting point for you.