Posts Tagged ‘central bank’

Why is the modern economy so dependent on ever-lasting growth?

Tuesday, August 11th, 2009

Have you ever wonder why economists and policy makers are so obsessed with economic growth? Why is it such an acute problem if the economy is not in a treadmill of growth (i.e. ever-lasting increase in the quantity of goods and services produced)? What is so bad with zero economic growth (i.e. an economy that takes it free and easy)?

As one of our readers wrote in our previous article,

This is all to say that the [modern capitalist] system is much more fragile than anyone would have guessed and that the cult of markets and efficiency have left the world with a system that is less and less resilient. The crisis that has begun over the last couple years begins to bear that out. In fact we’ve become dependent on efficiency and without it the system may just fail under it own weight. Time will tell but the process has begun.

Why?

We believe the root of the problem lies in the monetary system. Today, we have a monetary system that is at its heart a system of credit. That is, the ‘money’ that flows around the system is loaned out of existence. To understand what this means, read on…

Originally, mankind started with commodity money. Money was a physically tangible thing. In the 15th century, Spain found gold in the New World. As gold was money back then, Spain found a lot of money and became ‘rich’ as a result. Today, most of our money has become virtual, intangible and in the form of electronic information. The overwhelming values of transactions are made in the form of electronic fund transfers instead of exchange in physical paper cash.

Now, think of your cash at bank- it is an asset to you and a liability of the bank. Say, when you make a non-cash purchase (either with cheque, credit card, bank transfer, etc), that transaction ultimately becomes a transfer of liability from one entity to another. This text-book idea implies that assets have to exist first before it can be loaned out as someone’s else’s liability.

The real world does not conform to this text-book idea: liabilities are created by banks first (in the form of loans) before the assets exist (we recommend you read Marc Faber vs Steve Keen in inflation/deflation debate- Part 1: Steve Keen’s model if you need a deeper understanding). After the liabilities are created out of thin air, the bank then go hunting for the assets by borrowing from another entity (e.g. central bank, depositors, another bank, investors, etc). Ultimately, either directly or indirectly, that asset (currency) originates from the central bank.

The central bank is the only institution that can create assets (currency) out of thin air to be loaned out as liabilities. Imagine you are a central bank- all you need to do is to declare $100 into existence, lend it to the banking system and then have the power to demand that the money (which you created out of thin air) to be paid back to you at an interest rate that you decide.

The observant reader will then be asking this question: “If the entire economy pays back all the currency that was borrowed into existence, but still owes the interest, where does it get the currency to pay the interest?” The answer is startling simple: more currency has to be borrowed into existence to pay back the original interest!

Now, you can see that total debt in the economy will grow exponentially (compounded interest) continuously and can never be repaid fully. That means the economy has to grow continuously in order to generate the income to pay back the continuously growing debt. Since the physical world has a finite quantity of resources, the quantity of goods and services produced in the economy cannot always grow fast enough to match the continuously growing debt. Therefore, the only way to keep the system running is to add in price inflation (growth in the nominal value of the goods and services produced) so that the nominal value of the continuously growing debt can be repaid. That’s why, as our reader observed, the “cult of markets and efficiency” in the modern capitalistic economy is there by necessity to keep the economy growing continuously.

For the past decade, total private debt is growing at a speed far in excess of GDP growth (i.e. growth in income). For a while, it seemed sustainable because asset prices (most notably, house prices) were rising fast enough to keep the financial system solvent (i.e. able to pay back the continuously growing compounding debt in nominal terms). As you can see by now, if asset prices stops rising in the context of adequate economic growth, the game is over. That game-over situation is what we all know as the Global Financial Crisis (GFC).

The GFC trigger the economic phenomenon called deflation. Once the debtors (e.g. banks, households, businesses) become insolvent, they can cause their creditors to become insolvent, who in turn threaten the creditors’ creditors with insolvency. This systemic debt defaults will now reverse the debt growth, which means the currencies that are loaned into existence will be written off into non-existence, which means money supply will shrink, which in turn will cause vast tracts of the economy to shave off its productive capacity (e.g. unemployment, idle factories, excess capacity).

If the economy is not expected to grow sufficiently and the government wants to keep the wheel running, what would they do? The only course of action is run the money printing press (i.e. create currencies out of thin air, pump them into the system for free). The risk is that without a properly growing economy, they risk igniting another asset price bubble. An asset price bubble may seem to ‘work’ because they can keep the system solvent for a while, until the bubble burst and restart the deflation nightmare again. The government will then have to start the monetary printing press again while the economy shaves its productive capacity the second time. If this process is repeated umpteen times, it will come to a point whereby the only thing to keep the system running is rising asset prices and not economic growth. When that happens, it is hyperinflation.

The current asset price rebound around the world is the stage where rising asset prices are keeping the debt wheel running. We don’t know how long that gig will keep running.

If gold has no intrinsic value, is it a bubble?

Tuesday, March 17th, 2009

Today, we just received a comment from one of our readers,

I got two emails in my inbox today from sources I subscribe to that made me think of you and your hoard of gold. Firstly, the view of a smart guy who knows a lot about investing:

Gold is very expensive

Secondly, the views of another smart guy who knows a lot about technical analysis:

Gold Divergence Poses A Question

I think the gold/oil ratio is particularly telling, in that a gold bubble began forming in late 2008. Like I said previously, I don?t want to try to timing getting out of gold and into real assets, but good luck to you.

We took a read at the first link and saw this:

I know the gold bugs will hate this idea – because it harks back to the argument against gold – which is that it has no intrinsic value.

This is one of the most common argument against gold. While this argument is true in itself, the person who wrote that sentence has clearly forgotten the mirror image of that argument. As we wrote in October 2006 at Is gold an investment?,

This is because with its extremely limited industrial use, gold will not be worth that much at all.

So, we will repeat this point again: Gold has no intrinsic value. So, if gold has no intrinsic value and if you see its price going up, it is easy to conclude that it is a bubble. Now, having established the fact that gold has no intrinsic value, we will ask a mirror image question. What intrinsic value does a crisp piece of paper called the US dollar has?

You see, like gold, a crisp piece of US dollar has no intrinsic value too! There are completely no industrial uses for that piece of paper called the US dollar. Now, ask yourself this question: if that piece of paper called the US dollar has practical industrial use or is consumable the way tissue paper and tooth-pastes are, do you think people will still want to treat it as money? Now, imagine if one day the US government decree that all tooth-pastes become legal tender for payment and settlement of debt (i.e. function as money), how would you feel if you have to physically consume your money daily for the sake of oral hygiene?

Therefore, as we said before in Properties of good money, one important property of money is that it must not be something that is consumable. The only way for this property to be fulfilled is for money not to have any intrinsic value.

Now, back to gold. As we wrote before in What should be your fundamental reason for accumulating gold?,

We accumulate gold not just simply because we believe its ?price? is going up (though we think it is most likely to be so as a side effect?in case you are confused by what we mean, read on). This is because if we do so, the implication is that we are calibrating the value of gold in terms of units of fiat paper money (see Entrenched perception on the value of paper money).

Therefore, the fundamental reason for accumulating gold is not to ‘make’ money. The reason why you do so, is because you lack confidence in legal tender money. The bull market for gold since 2001 is an indication of a declining confidence in legal tender money, which like gold, has no intrinsic value. So, if you are very suspicious of central bankers playing hanky panky with the crisp piece of paper money called the dollar/ poound/ yen/ franc/ yuan/ etc, then your only alternative is to exchange those funny paper for physical gold.

Now that you understand this very fundamental point, what if you are still concerned about timing the market? If you are getting more and more suspicious of legal tender money (or getting more and more worried of a doomsday scenario), then market timing will be the least of your concern. Sure, you may want to time the market to get the maximum bang (gold) for your buck (paper money). But if market timing is still your over-ridding concern, then you are really missing the big picture. If you see gold price going up and up, it means you will have much greater worries than just market timing.

But if after all these explanations, you are still concerned about marketing timing, Marc Faber has this to say in his latest commentary:

I really dislike being called a gold bug. I wish I could be positive about the global economy and social and geopolitical condition, but the more I think about current condition, the more depressed I become. Amidst a global slump I believe that we are moving toward high inflation (a further depreciation in paper money?s purchasing power), evil fascism, and vicious military confrontations. In theory, gold would be the best asset to own in this condition. Also, in theory, gold should be the perfect insurance against economic, social, and political Armageddon. However, I have some reservations.

For one, gold has already experienced a powerful bull market between 2001 and the present. As a result, gold has become relatively expensive compared to equities and the CRB Index. I am not suggesting that this outperformance of gold compared to other commodities and equities cannot continue. In fact, I believe that in time one Dow Jones will buy less than one ounce of gold. However, near term, gold would seem to be both over-bought against the Dow Jones and the CRB Index. I concede that the overbought condition of gold compared to the Dow Jones and compared to the CRB Index could be corrected by a strong rebound in the Dow and the CRB Index rather than a further downward correction in gold. My bet would be that the CRB Index has significant rebound potential and…

The other concern I have about owning physical gold (and as I just said, I am holding on to my physical gold) is that things will get one day so bad in the world that governments will expropriate gold, as the US did in 1933. This is unlikely to happen this year but it is a concern I have for the long term, especially if gold rallies to several thousand dollars per ounce as a result of money printing by all central banks or because of wars! As Voltaire remarked, ?it is dangerous to be right when the government is wrong.?

Whether you should be buying, holding or selling gold today will depend on your personal circumstances, which includes what percentage of your wealth are currently in gold, your level of suspicion against fiat money and your level fear for a doomsday scenario. But remember, having some gold is better than having zero gold.

Why should central banks be independent from the government?

Wednesday, July 16th, 2008

Yesterday, one of our readers asked us this question:

Why is it important to keep central banks independent from the government? Wouldn’t it be better if the board of directors of a central bank are selected by the people, and therefore held accountable to the people for decisions, mistakes, and misjudgements?

At what point did central banks become concerned about targeting inflation? Before they existed, inflation was close to 0%, so surely they wouldn’t have been created with inflation targeting in mind?

The more I read, the more I feel that your ideal of a 100% reserve banking system with no central bank is the best way to control inflation (and to allow the people to understand the true cost of government projects [wars, etc] that is currently paid for through inflation). But why didn’t this work in the first place?

To answer these questions, we will turn back to history. As we explained before in A brief history of money and its breakdown- Part 2,

In the first phase, lasting from 1815 to 1914, the Western world was on a classical gold standard. Each national ?currency? was just a definition of a weight of gold. For example, the ?dollar? was defined as 1/20 of an ounce of gold. Each national currency was redeemable for gold on its pre-defined weight. Thus, if a nation were to recklessly inflate the supply of its money, it would run into danger of having its gold drained from its treasury.

Under an international gold standard, there was an automatic market mechanism to keep government from inflating the money supply and to keep each country’s balance of payment in equilibrium. Hence, the world enjoyed the benefits of only one monetary medium, which facilitated trade, investment and travel. Prices were also kept in check (see What is inflation and deflation?). During that time, there were periods of price rises (e.g. during war) followed by periods of price falls (e.g. when war ends), with relatively stable prices in between.

Why did it not work out in the end? Well, thanks to the First World War. As we all know, modern wars are terribly expensive. Under a gold standard, no country can ‘afford’ to fight any war for an extended period of time. Therefore, the only option was to go off the gold standard and resort to purely fiat paper money as it is today. You can read the rest of the monetary breakdown story at A brief history of money and its breakdown- Part 2.

Now, you know how the US is able to ‘afford’ to fight extended wars in Iraq and Afghanistan with expensive professional armies today.  A gold standard will make this truly unaffordable.

Today, the central banks of the US and Australia follows an inflation targeting policy. That is, monetary policy is set ensure that there is a consistent price rise within a target range. How did inflation targeting develop? Well, it is another long story. You can read about it straight from the RBA at Inflation Targeting: A Decade of Australian Experience.

Next, we come to the most important part: why should central banks be independent from the government?

First, we have to understand the basics. What is the purpose of money? In essence, money functions as (1) a medium of exchange, (2) unit of account and (3) a store of value. To perform these functions, money has to fulfil certain properties as described in Properties of good money and its integrity cannot be tampered with.

Now, consider the situation that we described in Recipe for hyperinflation:

… imagine you are the only person in town who has the authority to create money out of any piece of paper with your own signature. Wouldn?t this make you a pretty powerful person in town? With such power, you can acquire anything you wish at the expense of others.

Under the gold standard, gold is money that is under the control of the free market. No one or institution ‘owns’ or control the money. But today, the central bank is the only institution that has the authority to create money out of thin air. As we said in Recipe for hyperinflation,

Look at any piece of paper money today and you will find the words of a government decree (e.g. ?This Australian note is legal tender throughout Australia and its Territories?) and perhaps a signature or two.

In Australia, the signature belongs to the RBA governor.

What if we give the government (which already has executive power) the power to create money? This will give the government a deeper concentration of power! If you believe the old adage that power corrupts and absolute power absolutely corrupts, then you will not want such a deep concentration of power. As we said before in Have we escaped from the dangers of inflation?,

One final word: fiat money is only as stable as the government that enforce it, and only as safe as the stringency and integrity of the central banks who create it. Gold, on the other hand, yield to neither control nor will of any government.

That is why today, central banks are independent of the government, with complex and elaborate rules of money and credit creation (the exception will be Zimbabwe under Robert Mugabe). Our fear is that with this credit crisis worsening by the day, deflation may prove such a unthinkable threat (e.g. see How do we all pay for the bailout of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac?) that the government will ‘roll back’ all these rules one by one in order to keep the entire financial system solvent. As the ancient Chinese saying goes, the journey of a thousand mile begins with the first step. Therefore, the journey towards a hyperinflation hell will begin with such measures (see Recipe for hyperinflation). Your belief in whether you will see hyperinflation in your lifetime will depend on your faith on the government to maintain the integrity of money.

Next, what if we let the people vote for the board of directors who control the central banks? If shareholders have trouble keeping the directors of their company honest and accountable, then it will be the same for the central bank.

What cause booms and busts? Explanation of Austrian Business Cycle Theory metaphor

Wednesday, February 7th, 2007

In our previous article, What cause booms and busts? Introduction to the Austrian Business Cycle Theory, we introduced the Austrian Business Cycle Theory (ABCT) with a metaphor. Today, we will explain the meanings of the metaphor from the book, Economics for Real People.

As we all know, since we live in a world of scarcity, the economy has a finite amount of resources (e.g. land, capital, labour, technology, raw materials, etc) to produce the goods and services that consumers want. Thus, the gas in the bus represents all the available finite resources in the economy.

The economy is always producing goods and services. Thus, the trip across the desert represents a period of time of economic activity.

In any economy, there is a class of people called the ?entrepreneur.? They are the business people who take risks by anticipating what consumers may want in the future and create the products and services that meet these anticipated needs. A very good example of an entrepreneur is Henry Ford who introduced the motor car to the world. In the metaphor, you, the bus driver, represent the entrepreneurs in the economy.

Then there is a class of people called the ?consumers.? Basically, consumers enjoy the fruits of the economy?s production of goods and services?they ?consume? resources of the economy. The passengers in the metaphor represent the consumers of the economy. As we said before in The myth of financial asset ?investments? as savings, there is a need to make a choice ?between producing consumer goods for current consumption or capital goods which will help in producing future consumer goods.? In the metaphor, the choice to use how much air-conditioning for comfort represents the choice of the consumers in how much they want to consume now at the expense of saving for future consumption.

In the economy, the entrepreneurs will borrow capital to engage in investment spending in order to fulfil what the consumers may want or need in the future. The speed of the bus represents the amount of investment spending to undertake.

Finally, the bogey man who tampered with the passengers? survey results is the central bank, which sets the interest rates. Please note that we are not accusing the central banks of any misconduct?they happened to fit the villain in our choice of metaphor.

So, how do all these fit into the explanation of the business cycle? Stay tuned!

What cause booms and busts? Introduction to the Austrian Business Cycle Theory

Tuesday, February 6th, 2007

What causes the business cycle of booms and busts? According to popular belief, the business cycle is due to the collective mood of the consumers, which drives investments and spending. That is why Wall Street is so fixated on the readings of consumer confidence. Central banks, on the other hand, hope that by adjusting a lever called the ?interest rates?, fluctuations of the economic cycle can be smoothed through the resulting influence on investments and spending. Hence, it may seem that the Fed?s policy of ultra-loose monetary policy (of exceptionally low interest rates) several years ago not only prevented a recession, but created further economic growth.

But according to the Austrian School of thought, the control of interest rates is the very action that creates the business cycle. Thus, the Fed did not avert a recession several years ago. Instead, they merely defer it. Worse still, the extent of the coming recession is proportional to the excess of the prior artificially induced boom. By deferring a necessary recession and engineering a synthetic economic boom, the Fed is setting the stage of an even more severe recession down the track.

Before we introduce the Austrian Business Cycle Theory, let us ask a thought-provoking question: If we generally let market forces set the price of things (e.g. stocks, consumer goods, bonds, real estates, etc), then why is it that the price of money (interest rates) should not be chosen by the market? Does the central bank know better than the market to set the ?right? price of money?

Now, here comes the introduction to the Austrian Business Cycle Theory to explain the phenomena of booms and busts. For this, we will use a metaphor from this book, Economics for Real People:

Imagine that you are a bus driver, at the edge of a desert, about to take a busload of passengers across it. You have left all gas stations behind. Your destination is a town on the other side of the wasteland before you. You are faced with a trade-off: the faster you try to reach the town, the less the passengers can use the air-conditioning to alleviate the desert heat. Both higher speeds and higher air-conditioning settings will use up the gas more quickly. And since, in our luxurious bus, each passenger has his own temperature control for his seat, you, the driver, cannot control the total amount of air conditioning used on the trip.

In order to make your decision, you look at your fuel gauge and determine how much gas you have. You tell the passengers that they must now make a trade-off between comfort on the way and speed travelled, as the more air-conditioning they choose to use; the faster the bus will consume fuel. Then you collect statements from the passengers on what temperature they will keep their seat. You perform some calculations on mileage, speed, and fuel consumption, and pick the fastest speed at which you can travel, given the amount of gas you have and the passengers? statements about their use of the air-conditioning.

The passengers had to decide whether to cross the desert in greater comfort but arrive later at their final destination, or in less comfort but with an earlier arrival. The science of economics has little to say about the combination that they picked, other than that it seemed preferable to them at that moment of choice.

However, also imagine that, before you began your calculations, someone had sneaked up to the bus and replaced the passengers? real choices with a fake set that chose a higher temperature, in other words, one that makes it seem they will use less fuel than they really will. You will make your choice on travel speed as if the passengers will tolerate an average temperature of, say, 80 degrees, whereas in reality they will demand to have the bus cooled to an average of 70 degrees. Obviously, your calculations will prove to be incorrect, and the trip will not come out as you had planned. The trip will begin with you driving as if you have more resources available than you really do. It will end with you phoning for help, when the sputtering of your engine reveals the deception.

Stay tuned for the explanation of this metaphor!

Entrenched perception on the value of paper money

Monday, December 11th, 2006

Not long ago, we advised someone to buy gold as a hedge against inflation. That person?s reaction was, ?But gold prices had already doubled from a few years ago!?

As we think about that person?s reaction, we realised that people?s perception on the value of gold had changed immensely over the course of centuries. Two hundred years ago, people would rather trust gold much more than paper money. After all, paper money were just warehouse receipts for gold, which may well be forged or quantitatively inflated (this is, strictly speaking, fraud). Gold, on the other hand, had been selected by the free market over the course of centuries as the most reliable medium of money. It was considered far more reliable than paper because there was (and is) no way for anyone to easily inflate the supply of it at will (other than mining for it, which require significant time and effort).

Today, people?s entrenched perceptions are completely different. Somehow, by some strange reason, paper currency (with today?s technology, they can exist in the form of digital information) is mistakenly seen to be the more reliable store of value. It has come to the point that even the value of gold is measured in terms of paper currency. As we said before in How is inflation sabotaging our ability to measure the value of things?, how can we measure the value of something by using a yardstick that is as elastic as paper currency?

Now, since the gold prices had doubled from a few years ago, will it be subjected to the law of gravity and return to where it was? There is nothing to prevent gold from obeying (or disobeying) this ?law? but fundamentally, if this ever happen, the market will be behaving even more irrationally that it is right now. Think about it: if the quantity of paper currency (including credit, money substitutes, deposits, etc) is growing at a rate that far outstrips the rate of increase in the quantity of gold by a colossal margin, then the fundamental value of paper money relative to gold has to continue to fall significantly. Today, gold prices still far undervalue the fundamental worth of gold.

If we consider the way central banks around the world are grossly inflating the supply of paper currencies, we cannot help but feel that it is more risky to hold cash in the long run.

Why is China printing so much money?

Thursday, December 7th, 2006

In our previous article, Cause of inflation: Shanghai bubble case study, we explained that the root cause of price inflation is monetary inflation. The Chinese economy is awash with growing liquidity (that is, the economy is soaked with ever-growing supply of money). The next question to ask is: why is money supply growing in China?

One of the culprits for this problem is the inflexible exchange rate of the Chinese currency (RMB). The RMB is not a freely floating currency?its exchange rate is still controlled by the Chinese central bank albeit having some semblance of flexibility. At the current rate of exchange, the RMB is undervalued. Since it is undervalued, foreign capital will want to enter China in the form of foreigners buying up the RMB. If the RMB is a freely floating currency, the demand for it by foreigners will bid up its price, which will reduce its demand as it becomes more expensive. Conversely, as its price rose, domestic sellers of RMB will sell down its price. Finally, a market equilibrium price will be reached where the quantity supplied will meet its quantity demanded. Since the RMB?s undervalued exchange rate is still barred by the Chinese central bank from rising, foreign demand will exceed its domestic supply. So, the question is: where is the RMB going to come from? In the absence of capital controls freedom, the only choice the Chinese central bank has is to print RMB to maintain the undervalued exchange rate. Now, with foreigners armed with freshly printed RMB, they bided up the prices of Chinese assets, including stocks and properties. In the case of Shanghai, real estate prices had reached dangerously bubbled prices. As those newly printed money permeate its way into the rest of the Chinese economy, the result is price inflation. We are hearing reports from the grassroots level that prices of many things (including everyday goods and foodstuffs) in Shanghai are increasing.

Lately (as we mentioned before in Are you being ripped off by fund managers?), we are not keen in handing our hard-earned wealth into the managed fund that is sinking more money into the massive pool of raging liquidity in the Chinese economy. There are better alternatives to take part in the growth of China than to join in the bubble.

What should be your real reason for buying gold?

Monday, November 20th, 2006

Speculators are always in the market. Where speculators congregate, there will be herd behaviour, mob rule and rumours. Late last year, gold pierced the psychological US$500 market, which heralded in a ‘gold rush,’ culminating in a short-term price bubble of around US$730 in May this year (see our article, The story of gold). After the bubble burst, the gold price, till today, remained trapped in volatile range.

The aim of these gold speculators was to make as much money as possible in the shortest possible time. When they saw the price of gold moving up with great momentum, they joined in the party, resulting in a dangerous price bubble. Since they did not care about understanding the underlying value of gold that they were punting their money on (for hedge funds, it is usually other people’s money), the only reason for them buying is because the price was going up. As investors, we prefer to invest, not bet. When we look at gold, we perceive it differently from the gold speculators.

At this point in time, the gold price is still in a long-term uptrend. There is a good reason for it?its underlying trend is a big hint to us that something amiss is going on in the global currency system. Thus, as we said before, the root reason for investing in gold lies in your confidence (or rather, the lack of) in the fiat currency system which the world is using right now. And we would like to repeat this point again: the ?money? that we commonly use everyday is the fiat paper currency, which has no intrinsic value because it is not backed by anything physical (e.g. gold). Such ?money? can be conjured up at will by the central bank?s printing press. Thus, its value merely lies in everyone?s confidence in it (see our previous article, Gold & Oil, hand-in-hand).

Thus, your real reason for investing in gold is not to ?make money??you do so as a hedge to preserve your wealth.