In US shooting own foot with tariff on Chinese goods, we mentioned, ?China and the US are locked in an embrace of unhealthy co-dependency with each other.? Basically, the US spends by printing its own dollars and using them to pay for Chinese goods. The Chinese manufactures those goods to keep its factories running and massive supply of labour employed.
What if the US is hit with a hard deflationary recession? There are two schools of thought.
The first school of thought believes that China can still continue to grow and thus, given its massive US dollar reserves, will continue to spend them for her own growth and developments. This means that demand for commodities will continue to grow, leading to the commodities ?super-cycle? theory.
The second school of thought believes that US demand for Chinese goods will collapse, resulting in Chinese factories becoming idle and her massive labour pool being unemployed. This will lead to a collapse of Chinese demand for commodities, which in turn will drag the rest of the world into a recession.
We are more inclined to favour the second school of thought. We believe that a hard deflationary landing for the US economy will result in a contraction in liquidity in China as well. This in turn will prick the grotesque Chinese stock market bubble. With a significant segment of the Chinese middle-class having converted their real wealth into paper assets, a stock market crash will result in a serious loss of wealth for them. Also, with the collapse in US demand, much of the Chinese lower class (e.g. rural migrants), which supplied most of the cheap labour for the Chinese factories, will be unemployed. You can imagine that with the Chinese middle-class losing a significant portion of their wealth to a stock market crash and the Chinese lower-class being unemployed, an extremely serious situation will develop in the Chinese domestic front. In that case, China will experience a hard landing as well. It must be noted that ?hard-landings? are relative?a hard landing for the Chinese can be a soaring growth for the US. We are sure that at least in the short to medium term, Chinese demand for commodities will be crimped, especially given that commodity prices had ran up hard enough. In the long run, we suspect the Chinese are arguably in a better position than the US to recover from a hard landing. In that case, the long-term Chinese demand for commodities will grow, along with many severe corrections along the way.
Thus, since Australia?s economy is running on resources as the engine of growth, she will not escape the effects of a US hard landing as well.