Archive for July, 2010

Prepare to pull the trigger on speculating!

Thursday, July 29th, 2010

Back in When to start speculating again?, we mentioned that

When governments do ?something? about the deflationary pain, it will be a signal to shuffle your money back into speculation.

So, what will be the signs to watch out for?

Just a month ago, RBS warned their clients to get read for this:

Andrew Roberts, credit chief at RBS, is advising clients to read the Bernanke text very closely because the Fed is soon going to have to the pull the lever on “monster” quantitative easing (QE)”.

Marc Faber reckoned that it will happen soon and has given a rough time-frame…

When the money spigot turns on again, that’s the sign to start speculating again (note: speculate at your own risk). For those who are new, please read Bernankeism and hyper-inflation to understand the context of this article.

If the Australian economy ?booms? further, how is it setting the stage for a bigger bust later?

Wednesday, July 28th, 2010

Not long ago, the former Prime Minister of Australia, Kevin Rudd warned that Australia is facing a demographic crunch, which if not solved, will have grave implications on the Australian economy in the long-term. To put it simply, everything else being equal, Australians are getting older and older, which means that the Australian economy will not be able to continue increasing its production of goods and services. That means that the economic growth will slow, stagnate and eventually turn negative. On top of that, the Australian economy seems to have a problem with ?skills shortage,? which is threatening future economic growth (see Skills shortages shaping up as risk to economy).

This article is not free. A payment of 0.97 USD is required to access this article. For those who have already donated to this site, you will receive an email with the full article.

Sign in to see the content if you already bought it (sign-in instructions will be sent via email after payment).

Why central bankers are obsessed with inflation not breaching a certain band?

Sunday, July 25th, 2010

If you follow central bankers all over the world, you will notice that for many of them, their monetary policy (under normal economic circumstances) targets a particular rate of price inflation. In Australia, the RBA targets price inflation to be around the 2-3% band, according to their preferred measure of price inflation. In the US, the band was 1-2% (we doubt they are in the position of targeting price inflation now, given that they are now in the zone of unconventional monetary policy). It is not the same for every central bank though. For example, Singapore?s central bank, Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), based their monetary policy on the exchange rate.

By now, you may wonder why the RBA specifically target the band of 2-3%? Why not 4-5%? Why not 9-10%? Why not even higher so that price inflation will ?inflate? away the debt of the masses, as in the 1970s?

Around 4 months ago, Saul Eslake wrote a very insightful article (unusual for a mainstream economist),

 

These inflation targets were chosen because, when inflation is about ”2-point something”, people tend not to notice it. And when they don’t notice it, they tend not to do things to protect themselves against it that are likely to lead eventually to prices rising at a faster rate.

By contrast, when inflation is, say, 4 per cent or higher, experience amply demonstrates that people do notice it – and they start to do things to protect themselves against its adverse consequences, such as seeking higher wages, or (in the case of businesses) putting up prices in anticipation of faster increases in costs.

The inevitable result is that, sooner or later, inflation starts rising at a faster rate than 4 per cent, and the central bank is eventually obliged to raise interest rates to slow the economy sufficiently to bring inflation back down to 4 per cent again. But when it has done so (at some cost in terms of unemployment), people start doing the same things again to protect themselves against the effects of 4 per cent inflation.

In other words, a 4 per cent, or higher, inflation rate is unlikely to be sustainable in the way that a 2 or 3 per cent inflation rate has been. It is likely to result not only in inflation being more volatile, but also in economic activity being more volatile and, probably, slower on average.

You may notice that this is what we implied in an article that we wrote back in December 2008: Demand for money, inflation/deflation & its implication. Once you understand the logic, you will be able to see the application of systems thinking. In other words, once price inflation goes over a tipping point, it becomes a dynamic process whereby money supply will balloon in an ever increasing positive feedback loop, resulting in higher and higher price inflation rate, which if not arrested, becomes hyperinflation.

Concerns about China’s slowdown

Thursday, July 22nd, 2010

Back in April, when economic ?experts? were expecting further growth in the Chinese economy, we wrote in this article that

Contrarian investors like Marc Faber believes that the Chinese economy will ?slow down regardless? any time from now on. Whether this slowdown will be a nice soft-landing or a gut-wrenching crash is another matter.

Marc Faber was on record for saying that there?s a possibility that China may ?even crash.? How could the pundits missed the signs that something is really wrong with the Chinese growth in 2009? As we wrote back then, there were plenty of signs:

? there are massive excess productive capacities in the Chinese economy. As we wrote in Is China going to dump their excess metal stockpiles?, there are eye-witnesses? reports of ghost cities, vacant office blocks and apartments in China. It had been reported that China?s excess capacity for steel and cement production is around the current capacity of United States, Japan and India combined. All these points to a massive mis-allocation of resources in China, which according to the Austrian School of economic thought, a pre-cursor to a bust (see our free report, What causes economic booms and busts?).

That?s why, as we wrote in Chinese government cornered by inflation, bubbles & rich-poor gap, the Chinese government will have to rein in their runaway economy sooner or later (e.g. through administrative means, revaluation of the yuan). The longer they delay, the bigger the inevitable bust will be.

Today, the financial markets are finally noticing that China is slowing down more than expected. For example,

  1. Rate of decline for Chinese industrial production is more than expected.
  2. And if Chinese government statistics can be believed, even the inflation numbers were below expectation.
  3. Spot iron ore prices have been in free-fall since May.
  4. Steel production has now fallen to its lowest rate of growth since 2001.
  5. The Baltic Dry Index has lost more than 50% in one month.

Back in January, when we wrote Chinese government cornered by inflation, bubbles & rich-poor gap, we were wondering when the Chinese government will bite the bullet and rein in the runaway economy. We didn?t have to wait long to see it happening.

The question that the pundits and the financial markets will be wondering is this: will this unexpected rate of slowdown continue for rest of the year? Will it continue on to 2011? If they get it wrong (again), it goes to show that they have underestimated the resolve of the Chinese government to cool down the economy.

The risk is that the Chinese government may accidentally let the slowdown turn into a crash. We shall see.

Silver question on “How to buy and invest in physical gold and silver bullion”

Tuesday, July 20th, 2010

Yesterday, we were very delighted to receive this email from one of our readers regarding our book, How to buy and invest in physical gold and silver bullion:

I have been reading through your archives for the past few weeks, and also have just finished reading the gold and silver ebook. It is a wonderful resource, and I feel for the first time that I now have some educational starting points that will make any investing I do more of a strategy and less of a gamble.

I wanted to ask you about a point that came up in the gold and silver book – when talking about storage there was plenty of practical information about the security aspects, and a glancing mention of the fact that silver will corrode/tarnish and so will need to be kept in a “sealed” environment.

Could you possibly add some detail to that point? How sealed should it be? Absolutely airtight? Is there any way to clean it or reduce this problem without detracting from the value of the bullion/B Coin? Over what length of time will this be an issue?

Thanks again for a great e-book and for a very accessible and educational journal. I’m enjoying learning how to think again.

If you want to know the answer, you can look up this article on our other web site: More details about storing silver.

Should you leverage to the max in a long-run bull market?

Sunday, July 18th, 2010

Between 1970 and 1980, gold was in a bull market. In 1971, the average price of gold was around US$40. By January 1980, it hit US$850. So, the question is: Surely, it was a good idea to leverage as much as you can in the 1970s (assuming you knew that gold would be in a bull market)? Since gold prices multiplied by 21 times from 1971 to 1980, and if you leverage to the maximum at any time in the 1970s, you will become filthy rich by 1980 right?

Wrong!

If you leveraged say, 10:1 in December 1974, you will be likely to be financially wiped out by August 1976. Between that time, gold prices fell from US$195 to US$103- a correction of 47%. Then from August 1976, gold resumed its up-trend to the high of US$850.

The lesson here is clear. Even in the midst of a long-term bull-market, you can become bankrupt if you are highly leveraged and unlucky.

Next question to ask: What if a lot of people are highly leveraged at the same time, in the same asset class, believing that it is in a long-term bull market? We will turn the answer to this question to our readers.

Marketclub 2-Week No-Obligation *Completely* Free Trial

Thursday, July 15th, 2010

This announcement is for those who are into trading?

We just got word from our inside contact at MarketClub, that they’re opening up the premium service for a no cost 2 week trial! ‘Battle-tested’ trading veteran Adam Hewison and his team are allowing us to offer you TWO complimentary weeks of their service so you can see how much it can truly help your trading. Unlike other marketers, Market Club requires no payment info and cancels automatically in 2 weeks. So, you are not under obligation to buy anything from them. But if you are really into trading the financial markets, they offer a very powerful tool/education resource- we know because we use them ourselves.

Gain access to Marketclub?s multifaceted system including analysis, training videos and his proprietary signal system

Their arsenal of tools and unique indicators can really help you establish the overall trend of 320,000 tickers quickly and easily for many different time frames and trading styles.

On top of that, their customer support team is LIVE and readily available throughout your trial to help you navigate their service…

So take a few moments and sign up now for a 2 Week Free Trial to Marketclub and register for Thursdays Webinar to show you…

  • How to use the ‘Smart Scan’ feature to help you find your next trade
  • How the ‘Trade Triangles’ will tell you when to pull the trigger on a trade
  • How “Instant Alerts’ will keep you ahead of any unexpected moves (and send you an email if your ticker crosses over certain ‘parameters’ as well)
  • How to access their dedicated customer support team (they can explain all of the features of the system and walk you through it online OR on the phone).

This offer won?t be live for long don?t miss your chance to test drive one of the greatest values in trading while it lasts.

Sign up for the no-obligation 2 Week Free Trial

Another biased media report: home loans on the rise?

Tuesday, July 13th, 2010

In our report, How To Foolproof Yourself Against Salesmen & Media Bias, we wrote about how the media uses headlines to slip in their bias.

Well, here is a great example from this article in the Sydney Morning Herald (SMH)- Home loans on the rise:

The number of home loans issued to borrowers have marked their first rise in eight months are buyers looked beyond higher interest rates to wade back into the market. In a sign of caution, though, the size of a typical loan shrank.

In an another article from the SMH- Home loans up for first time in eight months:

A WEAK spot in the property market is showing tentative signs of recovery, after a surprise bounce in new lending to home buyers.

The headlines from the Daily Telegraph isn?t much better.

Despite the positive spin in these headlines, there?s a little detail that caught our eye. What is it?

This article is not free. A payment of 0.97 USD is required to access this article. For those who have already donated to this site, you will receive an email with the full article.

Sign in to see the content if you already bought it (sign-in instructions will be sent via email after payment).

If you want deflation, you would love Germany

Sunday, July 11th, 2010

From our previous article, one of our readers was very indignant at the current state of affairs. As he wrote,

During inflationary times, those who speculated made more money than those who held cash. so you could argue that those who held cash felt the "inflationary pain" but why wasn’t the government pressured politically to do something as they were when they get spooked by deflation?

Then when deflationary times come its the turn of those who held cash to benefit while those who already made their money out of speculation and over leveraging to feel the "deflationary pain", after all they did take too much risk.

I don’t think its fair or right for governments to manipulate the economy to prop up the prices of the investments of the speculators (who helped create all these bubbles in the fist place). Basically that means that they got to make a lot of money out of speculating but they didn’t take any real risk as government will step in to do "something" about the pain.

If the don’t feel the pain they will continue recklessly speculating.

Meanwhile that very same "something" the governments will do to help the speculators avoid pain will probably mean devaluation of the currency one way or another so that once again those who did not speculate and over leverage will feel the pain.

The governments actions will tend to encourage more people to speculate! I would like to see deflation happen, does anybody else feel the same way???

On the first point, why are governments more spooked by deflation than by inflation? The simple reason is that in a democracy, the mob rules. Unfortunately, the mob is heavily indebted as a whole. All we have to do is to look around and see that the culture of debt is deeply ingrained in society. For young people, not only is it fashionable to get into debt, it is very difficult not to get into debt. For example, buying your first home is enough to put you in debt for decades.

The last time governments became spooked by inflation was in 2008 when oil and food prices shot through the roof (see Who is to blame for surging food and oil prices?). If governments continue its policy of doing ?something? about deflation for a sustained period of time, we believe it will be a matter of time before prices of necessities will resume its surge again. As usual, the blame will be put on ?shortages? and ?speculators.?

But not all governments in the world are biased towards inflation. Germany is the exception here. The trauma of the hyperinflation during the Weimar times is seared into the German consciousness. As a result, they will avoid anything that hints of inflation. Unlike the English-speaking countries, politicians in Germany who stick to discipline, austerity, balanced budgets and stand against moral hazards see their popularity go up.

Coincidentally, Germany is also the most important member of the Euro zone. As a result, their attitude towards inflation is being imposed on Europe. In the recent G-20 meeting, the G-20 endorsed a halving of budget deficits by 2013 as the target.

But as George Soros wrote in a recent article,

The situation is eerily reminiscent of the 1930s. Doubts about sovereign credit are forcing reductions in budget deficits at a time when the banking system and the economy may not be strong enough to do without fiscal and monetary stimulus.

The Great Depression of the 1930s is one of deflation. In Soros? opinion, the G-20?s endorsement of government de-leveraging has increased the risk of deflation today.

So, in the coming months, we can see why the deflation argument will be gaining the upper hand.

When to start speculating again?

Thursday, July 8th, 2010

As we wrote before in Notice the change of narratives in the financial markets?, the theme for the coming months is likely to be deflation (contraction in the supply of money and credit). The symptoms of deflation will include falling asset and commodity prices and appreciation of the US dollar.

The reason why deflation is gaining the upper hand is that governments are not renewing their appetite for maintaining the crutch (economic ?stimulus?) to keep the economy from sinking. In Europe, the government themselves are deleveraging (see Keep up spending- Who?s right? Europe or America?).

But as contrarian investors, we have to keep one step ahead. As deflationary forces gather steam, eventually the government will be spooked. Eventually, they will be pressured politically to do ?something? about the situation. That ?something? will ultimately boils down to turning on the monetary printing press.

For example, as this news article reported, there is an expectation that the Chinese government will do ?something? if stock prices continue its downward trajectory. In the US, RBS recently warned its clients to be prepared for a ?monster? money-printing operation from the Federal Reserve (long before RBS released this, readers of this blog already know beforehand that this will happen- see Bernankeism and hyper-inflation).

When governments do ?something? about the deflationary pain, it will be a signal to shuffle your money back into speculation.